THE EID’S OF THE SHIA

Question:  How many Eids do the Shia’s celebrate? What is the reason for their falsehood spreading like wildfire?

Answer: People say ‘Shia’ Muslim’, however the word Muslim cannot be attached to Shia.

Sunan Ibn Majah 1098

Shia Celebrate another Eid on the 18th of Dhul Hijjah

The Kuffar Shia have concocted an Eid which they attach to Ghadeer-e-Khum which on account of their false love for Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu resembles the day Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu was given the title ‘Mawla’. The Hadith which speaks of Ghadir-Khum are authentic and how they catch this Ummah is they take these Ahaadith out of context to appease their corrupted views on separating the Ummah. We do not negate the status of Hadhrat ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu. A person who rejects the honour of Hadhrat ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu is not a Muslim. The Shia, however reject the two honoured companions that Allah Ta’alaa decreed to rest next to our beloved till Qiyaamah. Infact, the Kuffar Shia will have to walk past these honourable Sahaabah Radhiyallahu ‘Anhuma when greeting Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam.

What is Ghadir Khum and the festivities created by Shia?

There is consensus that Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam made this statement at a place called Ghadīr Khumm, which is midway between Makkah Mukarramah and Madīnah Munawarrah. It served as a rest stop for travellers providing water and shade. On his return to Madīnah, after the Farewell Ḥajj, Rasulullah Sallalallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam stopped here to rest and pray. This is accepted as fact by both the Shīʿah and Ahl al-Sunnah.

In Sahih Muslim it is reported,

قَامَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَوْمًا فِينَا خَطِيبًا بِمَاءٍ يُدْعَى خُمًّا بَيْنَ مَكَّةَ وَالْمَدِينَةِ

One day Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) stood up to deliver sermon at a watering place known as Khumm situated between Mecca and Medina. 

Sahih Muslim 2408

Ghadir-e-Khum is a place between Makkah Mukarramah and Madīnah Munwarrah, near the city of al-Juḥfah, and is a watering hole in the middle of the desert. Ghadīr Khumm is located approximately 250 km away from Makkah Mukarramah enroute to Medina Munawarrah. where Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam addressed the Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum after the farewell Hajj. If the address was to be made of importance to all, it would have surely been done during the farewell Hajj.  Shia’s base their baseless Eid surrounding a authentic Hadith found in Musnad Ahmed and other authentic sources.

However, this is where Muslims fall prey, as is the common scenario with those who have tainted objectives, they are masters at twisting the background of the Ahaadith in their favour.

Shia’s claim:

“Eid Al-Ghadeer is the commemoration of Prophet Muhammad’s (saw) final sermon at Ghadir Khumm, which took place on the 18th of Dhu al-Hijjah, 10 AH. Shias celebrate this incident as the basis for their acceptance of Imam Ali (a.s.) succession to the Prophet. ”

This already tells us this concocted Eid did not exist in the time of Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam nor in the time of Sahaabah Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu. However, insisting they use the Hadith below:

عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ وَهْبٍ، وَعَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ يُثَيْعٍ، قَالَا نَشَدَ عَلِيٌّ النَّاسَ فِي الرَّحَبَةِ مَنْ سَمِعَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَقُولُ يَوْمَ غَدِيرِ خُمٍّ إِلَّا قَامَ قَالَ فَقَامَ مِنْ قِبَلِ سَعِيدٍ سِتَّةٌ وَمِنْ قِبَلِ زَيْدٍ سِتَّةٌ فَشَهِدُوا أَنَّهُمْ سَمِعُوا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يَقُولُ لِعَلِيٍّ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ يَوْمَ غَدِيرِ خُمٍّ أَلَيْسَ اللَّهُ أَوْلَى بِالْمُؤْمِنِينَ قَالُوا بَلَى قَالَ اللَّهُمَّ مَنْ كُنْتُ مَوْلَاهُ فَعَلِيٌّ مَوْلَاهُ اللَّهُمَّ وَالِ مَنْ وَالَاهُ وَعَادِ مَنْ عَادَاهُ.

‘Ali adjured the people at ar-Rahbah, saying: Whoever heard the messenger of Allah (ﷺ) speak on the day of Ghadeer Khumm, let him stand up. And (of the people) around Sa’eed, six men stood up, and (of the people) around Zaid, six men stood up, and they testified that they had heard the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) say to ‘Ali (رضي الله عنه) on the day of Ghadeer Khumm. “Isn`t it Allah Who is closer to the believers?” They said: Yes. He said: `O Allah, if I am a person`s mawla (friend and supporter) then ‘Ali is also his mawla; O Allah, take as friends those who take him as a friend, and take as enemies those who take him as an enemy.”

This Hadith in fact is a direct testification that they are the enemies of Islam. They killed the Sayyiduna Hussain Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu, the son of Mawla Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu, the grandson of Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam. With what eye will they look at Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam on the day of Qiyaamah.

The Shia scholar, At-Tabrasi writes in Al-Ihtijaaj:

The Shia’s accept this Hadith of Musnad Ahmed which mention about Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam referring to Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu as Mawla but do they accept the Hadith of Bukhaari Shareef where Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam had referred to Hadhrat Zayd Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu as Mawla? Though the meaning of Mawla are many such as Rabb, King, Master, Freed Slave, Helper, Son of Uncle (as Ibn al-Athir has written in an-Nihaayah), the Shia’s claim it is in the meaning of Khilaafat. The reality is Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam used the word Mawla for Sayyiduna Zayd Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu too.

Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam said to Hadhrat Zayd Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu
أَنْتَ أَخُونَا وَمَوْلاَنَا ‏”‏‏”

This was said in the presence of Sayyiduna ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu. The truth is even Kuffaar Shia will agree here to say that we should look at two things, one: The background of the Hadith. Two: The different meanings of Mawla. So the background was Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam who was sent as a mercy to the entire universe resolved a mild dispute as Sayyiduna Zayd Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu, Hadhrat Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu and Sayyiduna Ja’far Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu all wanted to take care of the daughter of Sayyiduna Hamzah Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu. However, Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam declared to hand her over Sayyidah Fatima Radhiyallahu ‘Anha adding, “the Khala represents the mother in status”. Thereafter Rasulullah Sallallahu Alaihi wa Sallam praised each of the above mentioned Sahaabah Radhiyallahu Anhum. For details check Hadith 4251 of Bukhaari Shareef.

So the Shia’s will agree that the meaning of Mawla here referred to Sayyiduna Zayd Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu refers to “freed slave”.

In short, the background behind Ghadeer Khum also has to be considered. Why shall we ignore it at this juncture. Would it be to feed into the Shia’s dark misinterpretations?

In short, prior to Hajj, Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam sent ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu to Yemen to distribute the spoils after Khalid ibn al Walid Radhiyallahu Anhu’s military campaign in Yemen. There were certain points addressed to Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam. Some felt that ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu could have been more fair in his distribution. The Prophet Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam realised that there had been a misunderstanding and that there was some bitterness towards ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu from those who had complained about him. Having realised this, and finding a suitable opportunity to address the matter, the Prophet Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu addressed the entire gathering and said, “Whoever considers me his Mawla, then ‘Ali is also his Mawla.”

“Ali (Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu) being the Mawla of every believer is true during the life of the Messenger salla Llahu ‘alayhi wa sallam, his death, and even after the death of ‘Ali. Even today ‘Ali remains the “Mawla” of every believer even though he is not the governor over the people. In a similar manner all the believers are friends of one another living and deceased.”  Minhaj al Sunnah, 7/322-325.

Another question that is raised is three days before Rasulullah Salallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam’s pure body had left this temporary world, considering the Shia’ claim the 18th of Dhul Hijjah to be the most certain date in which Sayyiduna ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu was selected as Khalifah then why would Sayyiduna Abbaas bin Abdul Muttalib Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu humbly request an answer from Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alaihi wa Sallam regarding this:

اذْهَبْ بِنَا إِلَى رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَلْنَسْأَلْهُ فِيمَنْ هَذَا الأَمْرُ، إِنْ كَانَ فِينَا عَلِمْنَا ذَلِكَ، وَإِنْ كَانَ فِي غَيْرِنَا عَلِمْنَاهُ فَأَوْصَى بِنَا‏.‏ فَقَالَ عَلِيٌّ إِنَّا وَاللَّهِ لَئِنْ سَأَلْنَاهَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فَمَنَعَنَاهَا لاَ يُعْطِينَاهَا النَّاسُ بَعْدَهُ، وَإِنِّي وَاللَّهِ لاَ أَسْأَلُهَا رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم‏.‏

So let us go to Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) and ask him who will take over the Caliphate. If it is given to us we will know as to it, and if it is given to somebody else, we will inform him so that he may tell the new ruler to take care of us.” `Ali said, “By Allah, if we asked Allah’s Apostle for it (i.e. the Caliphate) and he denied it us, the people will never give it to us after that. And by Allah, I will not ask Allah’s Messenger (ﷺ) for it.

Bukhaari Shareef 4447

This all is done out of jealousy and out of their crooked beliefs to send a barrage of fitan upon this Ummah. They fail and make excuses when Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu had accepted the Khilafah of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu. Hadhrat Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu resolved the matter and said:

 فَقَالَ عَلِيٌّ لأَبِي بَكْرٍ مَوْعِدُكَ الْعَشِيَّةُ لِلْبَيْعَةِ‏

On that `Ali said to Abu Bakr, “I promise to give you the oath of allegiance in this after noon

The narration continues Hadhrat Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu even admits the favours of Allah Ta’alaa upon Hadhrat Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu with no jealousy:

تَشَهَّدَ عَلِيٌّ فَعَظَّمَ حَقَّ أَبِي بَكْرٍ، وَحَدَّثَ أَنَّهُ لَمْ يَحْمِلْهُ عَلَى الَّذِي صَنَعَ نَفَاسَةً عَلَى أَبِي بَكْرٍ، وَلاَ إِنْكَارًا لِلَّذِي فَضَّلَهُ اللَّهُ بِهِ

 He (Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu) uttered Tashah-hud, praised Abu Bakr (Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu’s) right, and said, that he had not done what he had done because of jealousy of Abu Bakr or as a protest of that Allah had favored him with

By this all the Muslims present witnessed the outcome and pledge of allegiance of Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu accepting the Khilafah of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu it brought great joy:

فَسُرَّ بِذَلِكَ الْمُسْلِمُونَ وَقَالُوا أَصَبْتَ‏.‏ وَكَانَ الْمُسْلِمُونَ إِلَى عَلِيٍّ قَرِيبًا، حِينَ رَاجَعَ الأَمْرَ الْمَعْرُوفَ‏.‏

 On that all the Muslims became happy and said, “You have done the right thing.” The Muslims then became friendly with `Ali (Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu) as he returned to what the people had done (i.e. giving the oath of allegiance to Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu).

Bukhaari Shareef 4240

Is it not strange at this juncture that Muslim’s accept the virtue of both Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu and Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu whilst Shia’s reject the virtue of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu. They go against whom they claim to be their Imaam. Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu acknowledged the virtue of Sayyiduna Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu. Whilst it is proven in their books that have gone to the wild extents of including it in their belief structure to disassociate from not only Hadhrat Abu Bakr Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu but rather as the Shia scholar states:

“Our beliefs regarding tabarru’ (disassociation): We disassociate from these four idols:
1. Abu Bakr (Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu)                                                                                            2. Umar (Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu)
3. Uthman (Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu)
4. Mu’awiyah (Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu)And we (Shias also) disassociate from the four females (Sahabiyyat):
1. Aa’ishah (Radhiyallahu ‘Anha)
2. Hafsah (Radhiyallahu ‘Anha)
3. Hindah (Radhiyallahu ‘Anha)
4. Ummul Hakam (the sister of Mu’awiyah Radhiyallahu ‘Anha)

And all their followers and they are the worst of Allah’s creation on the surface of the earth and
that Imaan in Allah, His Messenger, the Imaams except until one distances their enemies”

Khomaini writes in Kitab Al Tahara, Vol. 3, page 457:

أما سائر الطوائف من النصاب بل الخوارج، فلا دليل على نجاستهم وإن كانوا أشد عذابا من الكفار، فلو خرج سلطان على أمير المؤمنين لا بعنوان التدين، بل للمعارضة في الملك، أو غرض أخر كعائشة والزبير وطلحة ومعاوية وأشباههم أو نصب احد عداوة له أو لأحد من الأئمة ع لا بعنوان التدين بل لعداوة قريش أو بني هاشم أو العرب أو لأجل كونه قاتل ولده أو أبيه أو غير ذلك لا يوجب – ظاهرا- شيء منها نجاسة ظاهرية وإن كانوا أخبث من الكلاب والخنازير…

Translation of Khomaini’s evil and vile words:

“As for the other groups of the Nawasib, actually the Khawarij, even though they’ll get the more punished then the Kuffar, yet this is not proving them to be Najis (impure). Hence if a Sultan makes Khurooj (opposes/fights) Amir Al-Mu’minin – ‘alaihis-salam – not for religious reason, rather for worldly reason (seeking power) or other motives like Aaisha, Zubair, Talha, Mu’aawiya and their likes, or if someone holds Nasb/enmity towards him or one of the [twelve] Imams (ع), not due to religious reason rather because of his enmity towards the Quraish, or Bani Hashim or the Arabs or because [Ali] killed one of his children or his father etc. Apparently none of those are necessarily considered Najis (impure) from an apparent point of view, although in fact they are more impure than dogs and pigs.”

 

Another Eid which the Shia’s Celebrate is called ‘Eid Al-Zahraa’ also known as ‘Omar Kashaan’ (Torab 2007, p. 195). First established in the 16th century during the Safavid conversion of Iran to Shi’i Islam, Algar, Hamid (1990). “Caliphs and the Caliphate, as viewed by the Shiʿites of Persia”.  the festival was originally held around Abu Lu’lu’a’s sanctuary in Kashan, each year at the anniversary of Umar’s death on 26 Dhu al-Hijja of the Islamic year.^[7] However, later it also started to be observed elsewhere in Iran, sometimes on 9 Rabi’ al-Awwal rather than on 26 Dhu al-Hijja. (Algar 1990)

When their scholar who they refer to as Sayyid Mohammed al Musawi was asked, “What is Eid Al-Zahraa about?”

He replied:

Eid Al-Zahra ( 9th Rabi’ul Awwal) is one of the big days of happiness for Ahlul Bayt (AS). It is mentioned as the second Ghadeer. It is the day of the end of one of the main enemies of Lady Fatimah Al-Zahra (SA). In Quran we read that the believers celebrate and rejoice the end of the enemies of Allah (Sura 30, Verse 4).

Hadeeth of Ahmad Ibn Is-Haq al-Ash’ari from from Imam Hasan Al-Askari (AS) stated that the Prophet Muhammad (SAWA) has informed his grandsons Hasan and Husain to celebrate this day because it will be the end of their mother’s enemy. ( Dala’il al-Imamah by ibn Jareer al-Tabari and Rawdhaat al-Jannaat by al-Khonsari, page 768. 

Shia’s are Cursed by the Daughter of Sayyiduna Husayn Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu and Confirms they the Vile Shia Killed Sayyiduna ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu

We find in their (Shia) books, Ihtijaaj Tabrasi p.157, the statement of Sayyidah Fatima As-Sughra Radhiyallahu ‘Anha:

“O People of Kufa, O plotters and treacherous ones, you have belied us and taken us to be disbelievers. You have taken our blood to be permissible to shed and have taken our wealth as booty as you have done with the Turks and the people of Kabul, As you have killed our grandfather (Sayyiduna Ali Radhiyyallahu ‘Anhu) yesterday, your swords are dripping with our blood. On account of your previous malice, your eyes have been cooled, your hearts are pleased, you were bold against Allah and plotted and schemed and Allah will punish you severely for this”

Despite this, on the day of Eid al-Zahraa they attach much of their celebrations to the brutal murderer of Sayyiduna ‘Umar Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu.  A website named ‘Shia Youth’ to indoctrinate the naive states:

“Shia believe that Sayeda Fatima (s.a.) died as a result of injuries sustained after her house was raided by Umar ibn al-Khattab whom shi’as accuse of ‘threatening to set fire to her house. The door was supposedly rammed open by one of the assailants knocking Fatima (s.a.) to the ground. This attack is said to have cracked her rib-cage whilst she was pregnant, causing her to miscarry.”

Shia’s have honoured the killer of Hadhrat ‘Umar Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu calling him “a great killer” and “respectable scholar in Shiasm”. Both Muslim sources as well as the Kuffar Shia sources admit that he, Abu Lu’lu killed the second Khalifah of Islam Sayyiduna ‘Umar Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu as by the consensus of this Ummah.

Sayyiduna Hadhrat Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu mourned the death of Sayyiduna ‘Umar Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu,

عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي مُلَيْكَةَ، أَنَّهُ سَمِعَ ابْنَ عَبَّاسٍ، يَقُولُ وُضِعَ عُمَرُ عَلَى سَرِيرِهِ، فَتَكَنَّفَهُ النَّاسُ يَدْعُونَ وَيُصَلُّونَ قَبْلَ أَنْ يُرْفَعَ، وَأَنَا فِيهِمْ، فَلَمْ يَرُعْنِي إِلاَّ رَجُلٌ آخِذٌ مَنْكِبِي، فَإِذَا عَلِيٌّ فَتَرَحَّمَ عَلَى عُمَرَ، وَقَالَ مَا خَلَّفْتَ أَحَدًا أَحَبَّ إِلَىَّ أَنْ أَلْقَى اللَّهَ بِمِثْلِ عَمَلِهِ مِنْكَ، وَايْمُ اللَّهِ، إِنْ كُنْتُ لأَظُنُّ أَنْ يَجْعَلَكَ اللَّهُ مَعَ صَاحِبَيْكَ، وَحَسِبْتُ أَنِّي كُنْتُ كَثِيرًا أَسْمَعُ النَّبِيَّ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَقُولُ ذَهَبْتُ أَنَا وَأَبُو بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرُ، وَدَخَلْتُ أَنَا وَأَبُو بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرُ، وَخَرَجْتُ أَنَا وَأَبُو بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرُ‏.‏

Ibn Abi Mulayka narrates that he heard Sayyiduna Ibn ‘Abbaas Radhiyallahu ‘Anhuma say:
“When `Umar was put on his deathbed, the people gathered around him and invoked (Allah) and prayed for him before the body was taken away, and I was amongst them. Suddenly I felt somebody taking hold of my shoulder and found out that he was `Ali bin Abi Talib. `Ali invoked Allah’s Mercy for `Umar and said, “O `Umar! You have not left behind you a person whose deeds I like to imitate and meet Allah with more than I like your deeds. By Allah! I always thought that Allah would keep you with your two companions, for very often I used to hear the Prophet (ﷺ) saying, ‘I, Abu Bakr and `Umar went (somewhere); I, Abu Bakr and `Umar entered (somewhere); and I, Abu Bakr and `Umar went out.”

Sahih al-Bukhari 3685

After presenting to you the words of Hadhrat ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu the Fabricator Abu Ghadir (The Ghaddaar of this Ummah) has opened a Mawkib for Abu Lulu in Berlin, Deutschland. He indoctrinates the youth saying these vile words claiming to be an ardent follower of Sayyiduna ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu whereas he is the traitor of Sayyiduna ‘Ali Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu:

What do you say about a person who does not perform Salaah, but joins the Muslims in the rows and then as a coward and hypocrite does, puts a dagger through the back of the Imaam and then kills other Musalees and then kills himself? Would you call such a person a Muslim?

In the narration of Bukhari Shareef, Amr bin Maymoon Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu narrates:

فَمَا هُوَ إِلاَّ أَنْ كَبَّرَ فَسَمِعْتُهُ يَقُولُ قَتَلَنِي ـ أَوْ أَكَلَنِي ـ الْكَلْبُ‏.‏ حِينَ طَعَنَهُ، فَطَارَ الْعِلْجُ بِسِكِّينٍ ذَاتِ طَرَفَيْنِ لاَ يَمُرُّ عَلَى أَحَدٍ يَمِينًا وَلاَ شِمَالاً إِلاَّ طَعَنَهُ حَتَّى طَعَنَ ثَلاَثَةَ عَشَرَ رَجُلاً، مَاتَ مِنْهُمْ سَبْعَةٌ، فَلَمَّا رَأَى ذَلِكَ رَجُلٌ مِنَ الْمُسْلِمِينَ، طَرَحَ عَلَيْهِ بُرْنُسًا، فَلَمَّا ظَنَّ الْعِلْجُ أَنَّهُ مَأْخُوذٌ نَحَرَ نَفْسَهُ

“As soon as he said Takbir, I heard him saying, “The dog has killed or eaten me,” at the time he (i.e. the murderer) stabbed him. A non-Arab infidel proceeded on carrying a double-edged knife and stabbing all the persons he passed by on the right and left (till) he stabbed thirteen persons out of whom seven died. When one of the Muslims saw that, he threw a cloak on him. Realizing that he had been captured, the non-Arab infidel killed himself“

 Sahih al-Bukhari 3700

Yet you still say be silent upon those who protected Islam? The Ummah will act accordingly and rightfully when someone disrespects the Qur’aan Majeed but what happens when people disrespect those who gave their lives for the Qur’aan Majeed. Sayyiduna ‘Umar Radhiyallahu ‘Anhu was reciting the Qur’aan Shareef whilst the Munafaafiq plotted and carried out one of the most cold blooded killings in Islamic History?

Can you unite with them? Can you be silent on their Kufr? Can hug and embrace these rogue killers? Let a truthful heart answer these questions!