Evidence

SHIA LOVER TARIQ JAMEEL BRANDS TABLIGHI SENIORS WITH NIFAAQ

Invalid video ID

 

The man who once spoke and wah wah when he spoke of Jannah, the masses felt almost like they walking in Jannah. When he spoke of the maidens of paradise, imaginations grew and grew.

227 views

People grabbed the dust he once walked but the reality of those bayaans have been exposed. When Tariq Jameel Saheb recently came to South Africa, elders have seriously warned  of his waywardness. Forget the last trip last year, the True Ulamaa have been warning us now for years now.

He would use fabricated Ahaadith to impress crowds. This impressing of crowds was then drilled in his system! No sooner did he get involved with Bollywood actors and actresses:

223 views

 

 

 

Due to these above reasons and many more such as Tariq Jameel defending his love for Shia scholars opposing the entire Ummah, he Tariq Jameel who speaks hours on unity and not to label anyone with hypocrisy goes and says the Tabligh Jamaat is filled with Nifaaq? Further he threatens with Shaytaans proud statements such as, “You do not know what family I come from”

 

Can we call such people be our elders whilst sitting next to them and posting on X?

The very same who call for unity and not to label people with hypocrisy is now doing the opposite? Is this not double standards?

Ml-Tariq-Jameel-Saheb (2)

Will the Jamiatul Ulama SA ever admit their wrongs? They are the ones who invited all in SA to Shiasm via MTJ? No, ofcourse not because they themselves call for unity with the vile Shias!

 

Will Suhail Wadee ever respond for his fabricated and deceptive organisation called ‘Young Majlis’ after which he got caught?

Will Suhail Wadee ever admit he under his organisation Ashraful Aid played a part in inviting MTJ recently and then quickly deleted the evidence which now says ‘page doesn’t seem to exist’?

 

 

Here is what he quickly ran to delete:

Calling Tabligh Elders “FIlled with Nifaaq”
People have Shari’ reasons to call them hypocrites and due to these  Shari reasons they were banned from lecturing at the Mansera ijtimaa. Is this a Shari reason to call someone “filled with Nifaaq”

“Your hearts are filled with hypocrisy. You locked Raiwind, fearing that if I return, things will shift. (Below audio, listen from exactly 5 minutes”

Anyway, I am deeply hurt. You know how many years we’ve been together—I never spoke like this before.”

 

Translation:

Assalamualaykum again.

Let me remind you again—in 2018 you brought a new Bat Sahib, saying “You are not to be part of the Mashwara.” What kind of Tabligh is this?

I’ve never seen this in the Qur’an, in Hadith, in the Seerah, nor from Maulana Inaamul Hasan Sahib, nor from Maulana Abdul-Aziz, nor from Maulana Yusuf, nor Maulana Ilyas. This is your own invented Tabligh.

You remember clearly, the next gathering, you brought 10 people with you: Dr. Nadeem Sahib, Dr. Saleem Sahib, Dr. Roohullah Sahib, Maulvi Iftikhar, Maulvi Zia-ul-Haq, Maulvi Khurshid, Chaudhry Rafiq Sahib, Naeem Shah Sahib, Hashmat Sahib—there was one more. (I forgot but) I counted ten.

(At that tiem) You all came to my living room and said, “You are not to be part of the Mashwara.”

Are you blind to reason (this is outrageous)? Is this what you call Tabligh?

I’ve never demanded that I must speak, nor have I said don’t let me speak.

Maulana Hasan Sahib took my name—it was confirmed. Then you know in the next message what Maulvi Habib-ul-Haq and Zia-ul-Haq did.

Is this what you call Tabligh?

Maulvi Atiq told me himself that “Adeeb Musharraf says Tariq Jamil’s name should not be taken in Mashwara.”

Maulvi Sohail even held a meeting with the Ulema to instruct them if Maulana Tariq Jamil’s name comes up, you all must stand and protest.

Yet when Maulana Hasan suggested my name, no one dared to stand. If someone else had taken it, maybe they would have.

Even my own students came and told me what happened.

And you used Umar Farooq to block the visas of Maulvi Saeed’s Jamaats?

Is this Tabligh?

You people neither understand religion, nor the Qur’an, nor the Seerah. What are you doing sitting here?

You have hurt me deeply.

Allah used me to spread this message to the six continents of the world. Outside Raiwind, no one even knows who you are.Batla Sahib was speaking in Karachi, and the crowd was asking, “Who is this man speaking?”

You think of people as sheep to be herded.

I never asked to be the speaker. But the way your morals have declined—my old wounds had scabbed, but your filth has torn them open again. This will not end well.

Soon, Allah’s unseen hand will move. By Allah, I never conspire. But Allah’s unseen system will toss you out, like it tossed the Qureshis.

You have neither shame nor decency.

You drew a line—Tariq Jamil on one side, and you on the other.

You say my sons are making money? Fear Allah! What kind of talk is this?

You don’t even understand the ranks. I’ve dedicated my life. Since 18, I’ve been on this path. Now I’m 72. You wretched people—can’t you see?

Allah brought me here from a great family, through immense sacrifice—and you treat me like a plaything?

You put those who don’t even know how to speak in charge. The one Allah blessed, you try to cut down.

When Abdul Haq Sahib used to read the revelations of Kashf, where were your principles then?

You’ve made Yusuf Khurshid the leader of Rawalpindi—but he was always Maulvi Saad’s ally.

All of this is just for me. I will step aside quietly, visit the local masjid, attend the Thursday gathering, go for ghash (local preaching). But I will never leave Tabligh—not even at death’s door.

I’m calling you to shame—for your own good. Your hearts are filled with hypocrisy. You locked Raiwind, fearing that if I return, things will shift.

Anyway, I am deeply hurt. You know how many years we’ve been together—I never spoke like this before.

You’ve pushed me to the edge. But your own end is near, too. If you continue with this indecency and hypocrisy, you too will fall.

Maulvi Batla is the Amir now? Who made him Amir? Who decided that?

A man who can’t tolerate a second of anger—how can he be Amir?

And you all keep him in charge?

I will spread this message around the world.

Peace and blessings of Allah be upon you.

Maulvi Khurshid, this message is not specifically for you—just let those for whom it’s meant hear it.

Lastly, in 2000, Maulvi Arshad’s group came, and Raja Afsar made me a target. Then Raiwind’s system collapsed. Allah removed them.

Then the Qureshi group came—and Allah removed them too.

Now your group has surpassed both in foolishness.

So prepare yourselves—your time is coming.

No one can stop Allah’s decree.

I pray for you, you are dear friends, may Allah give you steadfastness.

But the pile of foolishness and incompetence you’ve built surpasses all.

You’re digging your own graves—and the fall is near.

TARIQ JAMEEL HUGGING LEADERS OF THE KUFFAAR SHIA ENTHUSIASTICALLY

Take note: Sayed Naqvi has accused Imaam Ahmed b Hambal Rahmatullahi Alaihi as being Shia. Check the rebuttal below. This is a fabrication of the highest nature as,

Maymuni reports that he heard Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal rahimahu Llah say:

و قال الميـموني سمعت احمد يقول : ما لهم و لمعاوية رضي الله عنه نسئل الله العافية و قال يا ابا الحسن إذا رايت أحدا يذكر أصحاب رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم بسوء فاتهمه على الاسلام

What is wrong with people that they speak ill about Muawiyah radiya Llahu ‘anhu? We beseech Allah for ease!” Then he said: “O Abu al Hasan! Whenever you see someone mentioning the Sahabah inappropriately, you should doubt his Islam.”

Al Sarim al Maslul, pg. 573.

The wild slanderer of Tariq Jameel claimed Imaam Abu Hanifah Rahmatullahi ‘Alaihi to be a “pakka Shia” whereas,

Imam al-Aazam Abu Hanifa said:

“The doctrine of Ahl al-Sunna wal-Jama’a consists in preferring the Two Shaykhs (tafdil al-shaykhayn) [i.e. Abu Bakr and ‘Umar over the rest], loving the Two Sons-in-law (hubb al-khatanayn) [i.e. ‘Ali and ‘Uthman], and [deeming lawful the] wiping on leather socks [in ablution] (al-mas-h ‘alal-khuffayn) [i.e. all three contrary to Shi’is].” [Khulasat al-Fatawa, Vol. 2, Page 381]

Narrated by Ibn ‘Abd al-Barr in al-Intiqa’ bi-Manaqib al-A’immat al-Thalathati al-Fuqaha’ through several different chains. The same is also related from Sufyan al-Thawri by al-La’laka’i in his I’tiqad Ahl al-Sunna, Vol. 1, Page 152.

2. Imam al-Aazam Abu Hanifah in Fiqh Al-Akbar:

The most superior and the best of all men after prophets – blessings and peace upon them – is Abu Bakr as-Siddiq. And then, Umar ibn al-Khattab al-Faruq. And then Uthman ibn Affan Dhu’n Nurayn. And then ali ibn Abu talib al-Murtada. May Allah be well pleased with them all; they were worshippers and steadfast on Truth and sided with Truth. We love all of them. [Fiqh Al-Akbar]

See the following two presentations in two parts:

Part One: 
Part Two: 

105 views

 

Related Articles

Back to top button