A recent article titled: “Majlis Flatulence: When Biryani Becomes a Sign of the End Times” surfaced. However this article bare of any substance or any names or organisation, so that the reader can have at least confidence in their writing if it contained any valid information.
To our surprise, it was leaked that this article was not even written by a human being. A lazy scholar offended by the latest article of the Majlis titled: “KHATMUL BUKHARI” STUNTS ALSO A SIGN OF QIYAAMAH” turned to AI in a desperate attempt to wipe off guilty biryani grains from his cheek. The nameless and worthless article moaned and groaned like a wrinkled actor who lost all public support.
We do not wish to tire you (O Reader) with AI generated rebuttals thus we will just produce a brief response to the first paragraph of the AI inspired scholar thereafter we will allow AI to battle it out with their own kind then you O Reader can make the final call.
Their AI Generated Article Reads:
“The Majlis has once again mistaken indigestion for inspiration and passed it off as divine insight.”
Rebuttal 1: They claim “Bukhari Jalsah” but such modernists have only learnt to fill their bellies and instead of heeding the warnings they are bloated with biryaani stains on their Kurtas and hearts. They failed to take lesson from the Hadith of Sayyiduna Anas ibn Malik Radhiyallahu ‘anhu which coincidently is in Sahih al-Bukhari:
عَنْ غَيْلاَنَ عَنْ أَنَسٍ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ قَالَ إِنَّكُمْ لَتَعْمَلُونَ أَعْمَالًا هِيَ أَدَقُّ فِي أَعْيُنِكُمْ مِنْ الشَّعَرِ إِنْ كُنَّا لَنَعُدُّهَا عَلَى عَهْدِ النَّبِيِّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ مِنْ الْمُوبِقَاتِ
Anas ibn Malik, Radhiyallahu anhu, said, “Verily, you indulge in deeds that are as insignificant as a hair in your eyes, yet in the time of the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings be upon him, we considered them sins.”
Source: Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī 6127
Rebuttal 2: The shy self proclaimed AI inspired scholar bare of any inspiration from revelation (Wahi Ghair Matloo) says: “With all the subtlety of a goat in a chandelier shop, the self-appointed custodians of misery have grunted out another fatwa, this time against “Khatmul Bukhari” events.”
Do these AI monks ever understand anything or is it just the mindset that now once we completed the Aalim course, our stomaches are the biggest concern?
The mysterious writer is perhaps not aware that Hadhrat Moulana Ahmed Sadeq Desai Hafidhulullah is not self appointed. Rather he was appointed by his Shiekh, Hadhrat Moulana Maseehullah Rahmatullahi ‘alaihi to advance to the Bukhari lesson in no time of the beginning of his Aalim course when Hadhratjee recognised his talent. Moulana Ahmed Sadeq Desai was abit uneasy to advance to the Bukhaari lesson and even requested to stay back then Hadhratjee Rahmatullahi ‘alaihi said words of encouragement. When Moulana entered the class, he sat at the back as students and the teacher was shocked to see a student go up the ladder in such a short time. Moulana read the Ahaadith then Hadhratjee heard about his performance said, “Did I not tell you”.
From that day onwards, the teachers of Jalaal aabaad would stand when Moulana would walk passed. He was not self appointed but rather instructed by his mentor! Listen:
Begs the question to the mysterious, who are you instructed by? Is Al the only support you could draw inspiration from to prove your Biryaani nagging?
From there onwards the AI generated piece only attacks and we find this highly hypocritical that the very thing you claim to be warning of, you are guilty of? And your guilt is higher because you will be reading this article still hoping that nobody finds out that you were the one who hid behind your under pants to ask AI to generate something to rescue the guilt dripping from your mouth!
LET ChatCPT analyse your lazy and brainless response:
It’s highly *plausible* that the response you shared was written by an AI—or at least *heavily edited or inspired by one*. Here’s why:
—
### 📍 *Stylistic & Linguistic Indicators of AI Authorship*
#### ✅ 1. *Fluent, Polished Satire*
* The piece uses *well-structured sarcasm, rhetorical flair, and **consistent voice*—hallmarks of advanced language models like ChatGPT or Claude.
* Sentences like “theological equivalent of a deranged street preacher” or “paragon of mercy and moderation” show clever, stylized writing, often seen in AI-generated satire.
#### ✅ 2. *Dense Metaphorical Language*
* Phrases like “quill trembling with rage,” “taxidermied version of Islam,” and “fatwa against joy” are vivid, layered, and often over-stylized — very typical of GPT-generated opinion pieces.
#### ✅ 3. *Balanced Structure Despite Extreme Tone*
* Despite being emotional and mocking, the piece follows a *coherent flow* with repeated motifs (biryani, vinegar, fatwa, etc.). This kind of patterning is typical in AI-written responses when prompted with “satirical rebuttal.”
#### ✅ 4. *Absence of Specific Personal Knowledge*
* The writer clearly *does not deeply know* the internal workings of The Majlis or its scholars—it’s attacking the public tone and output, not engaging with actual texts or historical context, another telltale sign.
—
### 📍 *Human or AI Collaboration?*
* A *human could have written this, but to write at this level of **polished sarcasm, with this much vocabulary variety and metaphor layering **in one go*, requires either:
* A very skilled satirist with a strong command of polemical English, or
* Someone using AI to generate or clean up their thoughts.
—
### 🧠 Most Likely Scenario
This is likely:
> 💡 *A human prompt to ChatGPT or a similar AI*, like:
> “Write a satirical response to The Majlis’ article on Bukhari Jalsahs. Be witty, mocking, and use rich metaphor.”
—
### ✅ Conclusion
*Yes, there’s a strong likelihood that the response was **generated by AI* or *written with significant AI assistance.*
> Its tone, structure, and style are classic outputs of a GPT-type model used for satirical editorial writing.
AI RECOGNISES THE MESSAGE OF THE MAJLIS AS:
## ✅ Conclusion:
Your teacher’s (Majlis- Moulana Ahmed Sadeq Desai’s fiery tone aside, *his concerns are rooted in authentic Islamic principles*. These Qur’anic verses and Hadiths highlight:
* *Sincerity in Deeni efforts*
* *Avoidance of show and extravagance*
* *Sensitivity toward the suffering of others*
* *Avoiding religious commercialization*
* *Maintaining boundaries from modernist distortions*
So if your own AI later turns against you then where is your trust in revelation explained by the four schools of thought which Hadhrat Moulana Ahmed Sadeq is advising this Ummah to go back to?
If the writer of that article would like more information or details for the above then please expose yourself and email us if you were truthful in your so called “rebuttal”. But no they won’t!
